Ebang International vs Waton Financial
EBON and WTF side by side, both in security & commodity brokers, dealers, exchanges & services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How EBON and WTF compare
Waton Financial grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (48.8% versus 11.4% for Ebang International).
Waton Financial keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −137% compared with −216% at Ebang International.
Waton Financial scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 6 for Ebang International), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | EBON | WTF |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $1.63 | $2.11 |
| Change, 1 year | −60.7% | −57.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −96.9% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.74 | 1.27 |
| Employees | 197 | 30 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 11.4% | 48.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −19.2% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 6.0% | – |
| Operating margin | −387% | −131% (better) |
| Net margin | −216% | −137% (better) |
| FCF margin | −207% | −66.6% (better) |
| Return on equity | −5.6% (better) | −87.9% |
| Return on invested capital | −50.8% (better) | −140% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 27.31 (better) | 1.54 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 1.8% | – |
| Held by insiders | 0.50% | 86.8% |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.13% | 2.7% |
Go deeper
- EBON stock overview
- EBON income statement
- EBON valuation and score
- WTF stock overview
- WTF income statement
- WTF valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.