Eagle Bancorp Montana vs Glacier Bancorp
EBMT and GBCI side by side, both in commercial banks. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How EBMT and GBCI compare
Glacier Bancorp is the larger company, worth 39 times as much as Eagle Bancorp Montana ($6.3B against $163M).
On earnings, Eagle Bancorp Montana is cheaper: it trades at 10.5× trailing earnings, against 19.9× for Glacier Bancorp.
Glacier Bancorp grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (14.3% versus 9.6% for Eagle Bancorp Montana).
Glacier Bancorp keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 286% compared with 15.9% at Eagle Bancorp Montana.
Both pay dividends: Eagle Bancorp Montana yields 2.8% and Glacier Bancorp 2.8%.
Eagle Bancorp Montana scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 11 for Glacier Bancorp), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | EBMT | GBCI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $163M | $6.3B |
| Share price | $20.51 | $48.47 |
| Change, 1 year | 23.6% | 14.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −8.1% | −17.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.37 | 0.81 |
| Employees | 279 | 4,188 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 (better) | 11 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 4 | 4 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 10.5× (better) | 19.9× |
| P/S | 1.7× (better) | 57.8× |
| P/B | 0.9× (better) | 1.5× |
| P/FCF | 7.7× (better) | 15.5× |
| PEG | 1.11 | – |
| FCF yield | 12.9% (better) | 6.5% |
| Fair value | $23.88 | $43.33 |
| Margin of safety | 14.1% (better) | −11.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 9.6% | 14.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −0.15% | 13.1% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 14.1% | 41.6% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 14.0% | 27.1% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −9.4% | −6.7% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 15.9% | 286% (better) |
| FCF margin | 21.7% | 373% (better) |
| Return on equity | 8.2% (better) | 7.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Altman Z-score | 0.16 | 0.20 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.8% (better) | 2.8% |
| Payout ratio | 30.1% | 54.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 8.4% (better) | −0.15% |
| Buyback yield | 0.25% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 3.1% (better) | 2.8% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 53.8% | 86.5% |
| Held by insiders | 6.3% | 0.65% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$701K | $115K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.5% | 7.4% |
Go deeper
- EBMT stock overview
- EBMT income statement
- EBMT valuation and score
- GBCI stock overview
- GBCI income statement
- GBCI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.