GrafTech International vs Power Integrations
EAF and POWI side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How EAF and POWI compare
Power Integrations is the larger company, worth 8.6 times as much as GrafTech International ($2.6B against $303M).
Power Integrations grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (2.3% versus −2.5% for GrafTech International).
Power Integrations keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 9.8% compared with −38.4% at GrafTech International.
Power Integrations pays a dividend yielding 1.8%; GrafTech International does not pay one.
Power Integrations scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 2 for GrafTech International), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | EAF | POWI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $303M | $2.6B |
| Share price | $11.25 | $46.49 |
| Change, 1 year | −15.0% | 30.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −91.0% | −56.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.60 | 1.38 |
| Employees | 1,071 | 877 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 2 | 13 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 58.8× |
| P/S | 0.6× (better) | 5.7× |
| P/B | – | 3.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 60.4× |
| P/FCF | – | 28.4× |
| FCF yield | −52.3% | 3.5% (better) |
| Fair value | – | $33.82 |
| Margin of safety | – | −37.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −2.5% | 2.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −16.3% | −1.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 149% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 155% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −19.7% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | −6.7% | 53.9% (better) |
| Operating margin | −21.0% | 8.4% (better) |
| Net margin | −38.4% | 9.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | −31.1% | 20.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 6.5% |
| Return on invested capital | −12.1% | 8.6% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | −1.1× | – |
| Current ratio | 3.55 | 7.88 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −0.85 | 19.49 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 2 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.8% |
| Payout ratio | – | 106% |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.00% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 1.8% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 39.1% | 112% |
| Held by insiders | 86.9% | 2.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $50.0K (better) | −$30.2M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 37.6% | 8.7% |
Go deeper
- EAF stock overview
- EAF income statement
- EAF valuation and score
- POWI stock overview
- POWI income statement
- POWI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.