StockData

Dyadic International vs Humacyte

DYAI and HUMA side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How DYAI and HUMA compare

Humacyte is the larger company, worth 12 times as much as Dyadic International ($164M against $14.1M).

Humacyte grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (52.5% versus −8.0% for Dyadic International).

Dyadic International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −200% compared with −3955% at Humacyte.

Dyadic International scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 2 for Humacyte), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricDYAIHUMA
Size and price
Market cap$14.1M$164M
Share price$0.388$0.592
Change, 1 year−61.2%−56.2%
Change, 5 years−89.9%−94.6%
Beta (5Y)1.212.06
Employees5184
StockData Score
Total score7 (better)2
Valuation score1 (better)0
Growth score01 (better)
Performance score1 (better)0
Health score5 (better)1
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S3.7× (better)68.6×
P/B–9.1×
FCF yield–−53.9%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−8.0%52.5% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average14.0%–
Profitability
Gross margin16.2% (better)−475%
Operating margin−195% (better)−4603%
Net margin−200% (better)−3955%
FCF margin–−3697%
Return on equity–−1424%
Financial health
Interest coverage–−11.0×
Current ratio1.653.34 (better)
Altman Z-score−22.64−10.29 (better)
Piotroski F-score24 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions12.7%26.4%
Held by insiders28.0%8.0%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$125K$7.4K (better)
Short interest, % of float0.32%11.0%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.