StockData

Dyadic International vs Evogene

DYAI and EVGN side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How DYAI and EVGN compare

Dyadic International grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−8.0% versus −30.9% for Evogene).

Dyadic International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −200% compared with −220% at Evogene.

Dyadic International scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 3 for Evogene), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricDYAIEVGN
Size and price
Market cap$14.1M–
Share price$0.388$0.395
Change, 1 year−61.2%−66.6%
Change, 5 years−89.9%−98.1%
Beta (5Y)1.211.04
Employees578
StockData Score
Total score7 (better)3
Valuation score1 (better)0
Growth score01 (better)
Performance score11
Health score5 (better)1
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S3.7×–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−8.0% (better)−30.9%
Revenue growth, 5Y average14.0%29.9% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin16.2% (better)−6.3%
Operating margin−195% (better)−364%
Net margin−200% (better)−220%
FCF margin–−354%
Financial health
Interest coverage–−7.3×
Current ratio1.653.57 (better)
Altman Z-score−22.64–
Piotroski F-score23 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions12.7%3.2%
Held by insiders28.0%50.7%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$125K$695K (better)
Short interest, % of float0.32%1.6%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.