Eason Technology vs High Templar Tech
DXF and HTT side by side, both in finance services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DXF and HTT compare
Eason Technology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−28.2% versus −81.1% for High Templar Tech).
High Templar Tech scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 1 for Eason Technology), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DXF | HTT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $0.297 | $1.71 |
| Change, 1 year | −88.8% | −64.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −100.0% | 12.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 3.24 | 1.04 |
| Employees | 15 | 940 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 1 | 8 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −28.2% (better) | −81.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | −59.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 673% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 58.0% (better) | 7.1% |
| Operating margin | – | −973% |
| Net margin | – | 1730% |
| FCF margin | – | 1393% |
| Return on equity | – | 6.2% |
| Return on invested capital | – | −5.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.14 |
| Current ratio | 3.33 | 5.75 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 5 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 0.00% | 6.0% |
| Held by insiders | 6.4% | 42.4% |
Go deeper
- DXF stock overview
- DXF income statement
- DXF valuation and score
- HTT stock overview
- HTT income statement
- HTT valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.