Eason Technology vs Solana
DXF and HSDT side by side, both in finance services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DXF and HSDT compare
Solana grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (1466% versus −28.2% for Eason Technology).
Solana scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 1 for Eason Technology), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DXF | HSDT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $105M |
| Share price | $0.261 | $1.73 |
| Change, 1 year | −90.5% | −66.9% |
| Change, 5 years | −100.0% | −100.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 3.22 | 1.08 |
| Employees | 15 | 21 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 1 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | – | 7.1× |
| P/B | – | 0.4× |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −28.2% | 1466% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 55.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 58.0% | 92.8% (better) |
| Operating margin | – | −1557% |
| Net margin | – | 2040% |
| Return on equity | – | 528% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 3.33 (better) | 2.33 |
| Altman Z-score | – | −0.31 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | – | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 0.00% | 26.1% |
| Held by insiders | 6.4% | 40.4% |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 9.5% |
Go deeper
- DXF stock overview
- DXF income statement
- DXF valuation and score
- HSDT stock overview
- HSDT income statement
- HSDT valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.