Dawson Geophysical vs Mammoth Energy Services
DWSN and TUSK side by side, both in oil and gas field services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DWSN and TUSK compare
Mammoth Energy Services is the larger company, worth 2.7 times as much as Dawson Geophysical ($153M against $56.8M).
On earnings, Mammoth Energy Services is cheaper: it trades at 11.0× trailing earnings, against 15.3× for Dawson Geophysical.
Dawson Geophysical grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (86.3% versus −54.8% for Mammoth Energy Services).
Mammoth Energy Services keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 17.1% compared with 3.5% at Dawson Geophysical.
Mammoth Energy Services scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 10 for Dawson Geophysical), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DWSN | TUSK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $56.8M | $153M |
| Share price | $1.83 | $3.18 |
| Change, 1 year | −9.4% | 54.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −21.5% | 5.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.08 | 0.87 |
| Employees | 269 | 115 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Health score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 15.3× | 11.0× (better) |
| P/S | 0.5× (better) | 1.9× |
| P/B | 2.8× | 0.6× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.7× | – |
| FCF yield | −7.8% (better) | −93.3% |
| Fair value | $2.36 | $6.28 |
| Margin of safety | 22.5% | 49.4% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 86.3% (better) | −54.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −2.6% (better) | −32.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 22.3% | – |
| Operating margin | 4.6% (better) | −10.6% |
| Net margin | 3.5% | 17.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | −4.3% (better) | −181% |
| Return on equity | 20.0% (better) | 5.3% |
| Return on invested capital | 27.6% (better) | −4.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.87 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.94 | – |
| Interest coverage | 3.6× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.87 | 1.50 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −0.35 | 0.31 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 6.8% | 54.2% |
| Held by insiders | 80.4% | – |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $10.5M |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.1% | – |
Go deeper
- DWSN stock overview
- DWSN income statement
- DWSN valuation and score
- TUSK stock overview
- TUSK income statement
- TUSK valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.