Duos Technologies vs Intelligent Protection Management
DUOT and IPM side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DUOT and IPM compare
Duos Technologies is the larger company, worth 11 times as much as Intelligent Protection Management ($172M against $15.5M).
Duos Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (271% versus 68.4% for Intelligent Protection Management).
Intelligent Protection Management keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −11.4% compared with −36.4% at Duos Technologies.
Intelligent Protection Management scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 7 for Duos Technologies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DUOT | IPM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $172M | $15.5M |
| Share price | $5.48 | $1.72 |
| Change, 1 year | −45.1% | −13.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −8.8% | −55.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.43 | 0.91 |
| Employees | 84 | 1 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 10 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 | 1 |
| Health score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 6.4× | 0.5× (better) |
| P/B | 0.8× (better) | 1.0× |
| P/FCF | – | 3.6× |
| FCF yield | −21.7% | 27.6% (better) |
| Fair value | – | $5.53 |
| Margin of safety | – | 68.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 271% (better) | 68.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 27.4% (better) | −66.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 29.2% | 40.8% (better) |
| Operating margin | −36.1% | −13.3% (better) |
| Net margin | −36.4% | −11.4% (better) |
| FCF margin | −138% | 14.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | −9.4% (better) | −20.0% |
| Return on invested capital | −16.6% (better) | −36.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | −22.2× | – |
| Current ratio | 8.47 (better) | 1.20 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.37 (better) | −0.05 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | −31.3% | – |
| Shareholder yield | −31.3% | 0.00% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 58.9% | 4.5% |
| Held by insiders | 2.5% | 44.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $218K (better) | $146K |
| Short interest, % of float | 20.4% | 0.48% |
Go deeper
- DUOT stock overview
- DUOT income statement
- DUOT valuation and score
- IPM stock overview
- IPM income statement
- IPM valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.