DUKE Robotics vs AgEagle Aerial Systems
DUKR and UAVS side by side, both in aircraft and parts. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DUKR and UAVS compare
AgEagle Aerial Systems is the larger company, worth 3.3 times as much as DUKE Robotics ($22.6M against $6.9M).
DUKE Robotics scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 3 for AgEagle Aerial Systems), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DUKR | UAVS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $6.9M | $22.6M |
| Share price | $2.02 | $0.360 |
| Change, 1 year | 819% | −74.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 494% | −100.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | – | 2.37 |
| Employees | 1 | 58 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 1 |
| Growth score | 0 | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | – | 2.5× |
| P/B | 1.0× | 0.7× (better) |
| FCF yield | – | −65.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | – | −35.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 58.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 45.4% |
| Operating margin | – | −247% |
| Net margin | – | −276% |
| FCF margin | – | −165% |
| Return on equity | −66.6% (better) | −106% |
| Return on invested capital | – | −135% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 (better) |
| Current ratio | 14.47 (better) | 6.43 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.59 (better) | −8.12 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 22.4% | 10.1% |
| Held by insiders | 65.9% | 1.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $9.9K |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 5.3% |
Go deeper
- DUKR stock overview
- DUKR income statement
- DUKR valuation and score
- UAVS stock overview
- UAVS income statement
- UAVS valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.