Deswell Industries vs Karat Packaging
DSWL and KRT side by side, both in miscellaneous plastics products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DSWL and KRT compare
Karat Packaging grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (11.0% versus −9.3% for Deswell Industries).
Deswell Industries keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 17.3% compared with 9.4% at Karat Packaging.
Karat Packaging pays a dividend yielding 5.4%; Deswell Industries does not pay one.
Karat Packaging scores higher on the StockData Score (26 against 11 for Deswell Industries), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DSWL | KRT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $667M |
| Share price | $3.02 | $33.45 |
| Change, 1 year | −14.9% | 52.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −37.0% | 59.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.26 | 0.79 |
| Employees | 854 | 696 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 | 26 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 14.2× |
| P/S | – | 1.3× |
| P/B | – | 4.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 9.3× |
| P/FCF | – | 10.3× |
| PEG | – | 1.50 |
| FCF yield | – | 9.7% |
| Fair value | – | $45.00 |
| Margin of safety | – | 25.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −9.3% | 11.0% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −1.1% | 9.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −4.6% | 56.1% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −4.3% | 57.3% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 5.6% | 6.7% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 22.4% | 40.3% (better) |
| Operating margin | 3.2% | 11.8% (better) |
| Net margin | 17.3% (better) | 9.4% |
| FCF margin | 7.7% | 12.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | 10.0% | 29.8% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 3.7% | 33.0% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.14 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −0.29 |
| Interest coverage | – | 34.1× |
| Current ratio | 5.25 (better) | 1.83 |
| Altman Z-score | – | 5.93 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 5.4% |
| Payout ratio | 30.0% | 76.9% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 2.1% | 114% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | – | 5.4% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 6.1% | 35.7% |
| Held by insiders | 71.3% | 57.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$593K |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.03% | 7.8% |
Go deeper
- DSWL stock overview
- DSWL income statement
- DSWL valuation and score
- KRT stock overview
- KRT income statement
- KRT valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.