Driven Brands vs Valvoline
DRVN and VVV side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DRVN and VVV compare
Valvoline is the larger company, worth 2.0 times as much as Driven Brands ($4.1B against $2.0B).
On earnings, Driven Brands is cheaper: it trades at 12.4× trailing earnings, against 40.9× for Valvoline.
Valvoline grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (16.1% versus 7.6% for Driven Brands).
Driven Brands scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 9 for Valvoline), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DRVN | VVV |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.0B | $4.1B |
| Share price | $12.40 | $32.29 |
| Change, 1 year | −16.7% | −1.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −61.4% | −5.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.01 | 0.81 |
| Employees | 7,100 | 11K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 3 | 3 |
| Performance score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 12.4× (better) | 40.9× |
| P/S | 1.1× (better) | 2.1× |
| P/B | 2.5× (better) | 9.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | 10.0× (better) | 18.7× |
| P/FCF | 15.3× (better) | 30.4× |
| PEG | 0.25 | – |
| FCF yield | 6.5% (better) | 3.3% |
| Fair value | $29.05 | $19.95 |
| Margin of safety | 57.3% (better) | −61.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 7.6% | 16.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 15.5% | 18.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −63.5% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −63.3% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −0.60% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 38.3% |
| Operating margin | 14.0% | 15.3% (better) |
| Net margin | – | 5.2% |
| FCF margin | 6.9% (better) | 6.9% |
| Return on equity | – | 27.8% |
| Return on invested capital | 10.3% | 10.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 2.02 (better) | 3.84 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.22 (better) | 5.04 |
| Interest coverage | 2.8× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.47 (better) | 0.70 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.97 | 1.75 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 8 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | 0.00% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 43.6% | 117% |
| Held by insiders | 2.7% | 0.33% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$750K | $308K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.7% | 12.1% |
Go deeper
- DRVN stock overview
- DRVN income statement
- DRVN valuation and score
- VVV stock overview
- VVV income statement
- VVV valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.