Dominos Pizza vs Papa Johns International
DPZ and PZZA side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DPZ and PZZA compare
Dominos Pizza is the larger company, worth 17 times as much as Papa Johns International ($10.4B against $608M).
On earnings, Dominos Pizza is cheaper: it trades at 17.3× trailing earnings, against 23.4× for Papa Johns International.
Dominos Pizza grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (4.5% versus −5.6% for Papa Johns International).
Dominos Pizza keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 12.0% compared with 1.4% at Papa Johns International.
Both pay dividends: Dominos Pizza yields 2.5% and Papa Johns International 7.5%.
Dominos Pizza scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 12 for Papa Johns International), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DPZ | PZZA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $10.4B | $608M |
| Share price | $313.71 | $18.45 |
| Change, 1 year | −22.7% | −64.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −36.7% | −86.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.77 | 1.03 |
| Employees | 10K | 9,400 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 (better) | 12 |
| Valuation score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend score | 4 | 4 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 17.3× (better) | 23.4× |
| P/S | 2.0× | 0.3× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.8× | 7.5× (better) |
| P/FCF | 16.3× (better) | 17.7× |
| PEG | 1.45 | – |
| FCF yield | 6.1% (better) | 5.6% |
| Fair value | $431.31 | $33.82 |
| Margin of safety | 27.3% | 45.4% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 4.5% (better) | −5.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 3.7% (better) | 2.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 3.4% (better) | −63.4% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 6.1% (better) | −65.2% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 7.2% (better) | −6.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 40.0% (better) | 28.7% |
| Operating margin | 19.7% (better) | 4.3% |
| Net margin | 12.0% (better) | 1.4% |
| FCF margin | 12.5% (better) | 1.7% |
| Return on invested capital | 110% (better) | 21.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.28 | 3.96 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 5.0× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.49 | 0.83 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.04 | 3.35 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.5% | 7.5% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 41.3% | 223% |
| Years of dividend growth | 12 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 17.4% (better) | 15.4% |
| Buyback yield | 3.7% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 6.2% | 7.5% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 111% | 114% |
| Held by insiders | 0.59% | 1.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$14.7M | – |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.9% | 20.7% |
Go deeper
- DPZ stock overview
- DPZ income statement
- DPZ valuation and score
- PZZA stock overview
- PZZA income statement
- PZZA valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.