Dominos Pizza vs HF Foods
DPZ and HFFG side by side, both in groceries and related products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DPZ and HFFG compare
Dominos Pizza is the larger company, worth 133 times as much as HF Foods ($10.4B against $78.2M).
Dominos Pizza grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (4.5% versus 2.8% for HF Foods).
Dominos Pizza keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 12.0% compared with −2.8% at HF Foods.
Dominos Pizza pays a dividend yielding 2.5%; HF Foods does not pay one.
Dominos Pizza scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 5 for HF Foods), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DPZ | HFFG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $10.4B | $78.2M |
| Share price | $313.71 | $1.45 |
| Change, 1 year | −22.7% | −32.9% |
| Change, 5 years | −36.7% | −81.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.77 | 1.06 |
| Employees | 10K | 949 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 17.3× | – |
| P/S | 2.0× | 0.1× (better) |
| P/B | – | 0.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.8× | – |
| P/FCF | 16.3× | – |
| PEG | 1.45 | – |
| FCF yield | 6.1% (better) | −4.4% |
| Fair value | $431.31 | $7.67 |
| Margin of safety | 27.3% | 81.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 4.5% (better) | 2.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 3.7% | 16.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 3.4% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 6.1% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 7.2% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 40.0% (better) | 16.6% |
| Operating margin | 19.7% (better) | −2.8% |
| Net margin | 12.0% (better) | −2.8% |
| FCF margin | 12.5% (better) | −0.28% |
| Return on equity | – | −15.5% |
| Return on invested capital | 110% (better) | −8.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.49 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.28 | – |
| Interest coverage | 5.0× (better) | −2.9× |
| Current ratio | 0.49 | 1.11 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.04 (better) | 1.24 |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.5% | – |
| Payout ratio | 41.3% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 12 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 17.4% | – |
| Buyback yield | 3.7% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 6.2% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 111% | 16.2% |
| Held by insiders | 0.59% | 9.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$14.7M | $82.6K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.9% | 0.40% |
Go deeper
- DPZ stock overview
- DPZ income statement
- DPZ valuation and score
- HFFG stock overview
- HFFG income statement
- HFFG valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.