Amdocs vs EPAM Systems
DOX and EPAM side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DOX and EPAM compare
EPAM Systems grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (6.6% versus −9.4% for Amdocs).
Amdocs keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 12.5% compared with 7.5% at EPAM Systems.
EPAM Systems scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 10 for Amdocs), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DOX | EPAM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $8.5B |
| Share price | $44.11 | $163.83 |
| Change, 1 year | −47.5% | −9.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −39.4% | −75.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.63 | 1.44 |
| Employees | 6,000 | 14K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 | 17 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Health score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 20.5× |
| P/S | – | 1.5× |
| P/B | – | 2.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 10.4× |
| P/FCF | – | 18.0× |
| FCF yield | – | 5.6% |
| Fair value | – | $225.17 |
| Margin of safety | – | 27.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −9.4% | 6.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 1.7% | 15.5% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 14.5% (better) | 14.4% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 18.8% | 22.1% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 6.4% (better) | 3.7% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 29.9% |
| Operating margin | 16.1% (better) | 10.5% |
| Net margin | 12.5% (better) | 7.5% |
| FCF margin | – | 8.3% |
| Return on equity | 16.4% (better) | 11.6% |
| Return on invested capital | 15.7% | 16.8% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.19 | 0.01 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.44 (better) | −1.30 |
| Current ratio | 1.17 | 2.76 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | – | 6.67 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Years of dividend growth | 13 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 10.2% | – |
| Buyback yield | – | 8.4% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 8.4% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 97.4% | 111% |
| Held by insiders | 1.2% | 4.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$29.0K (better) | −$990K |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.7% | 13.0% |
Go deeper
- DOX stock overview
- DOX income statement
- DOX valuation and score
- EPAM stock overview
- EPAM income statement
- EPAM valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.