Douglas Elliman vs Opendoor Technologies
DOUG and OPEN side by side, both in real estate. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DOUG and OPEN compare
Opendoor Technologies is the larger company, worth 8.4 times as much as Douglas Elliman ($1.3B against $158M).
Douglas Elliman grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−3.5% versus −28.8% for Opendoor Technologies).
Douglas Elliman keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.7% compared with −49.1% at Opendoor Technologies.
Douglas Elliman scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 1 for Opendoor Technologies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DOUG | OPEN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $158M | $1.3B |
| Share price | $1.74 | $1.36 |
| Change, 1 year | −33.1% | −82.9% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −93.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.28 | 2.97 |
| Employees | 580 | 1,042 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 0 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 2.6× | – |
| P/S | 0.2× (better) | 0.4× |
| P/B | 0.9× (better) | 2.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | 0.6× | – |
| FCF yield | −4.5% (better) | −131% |
| Fair value | $10.69 | $1.20 |
| Margin of safety | 83.7% (better) | −14.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −3.5% (better) | −28.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.9% | 11.1% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 7.5% |
| Operating margin | 5.3% (better) | −19.0% |
| Net margin | 5.7% (better) | −49.1% |
| FCF margin | −0.71% (better) | −51.8% |
| Return on equity | 39.1% (better) | −235% |
| Return on invested capital | 190% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | 122× (better) | −5.4× |
| Current ratio | 1.63 | 1.68 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.74 (better) | −1.03 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 53.1% | 58.9% |
| Held by insiders | 13.4% | 17.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$336K |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.1% | – |
Go deeper
- DOUG stock overview
- DOUG income statement
- DOUG valuation and score
- OPEN stock overview
- OPEN income statement
- OPEN valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.