Douglas Elliman vs Offerpad Solutions
DOUG and OPAD side by side, both in real estate. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DOUG and OPAD compare
Douglas Elliman is the larger company, worth 17 times as much as Offerpad Solutions ($150M against $8.6M).
Douglas Elliman grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−3.5% versus −44.3% for Offerpad Solutions).
Douglas Elliman keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.7% compared with −11.3% at Offerpad Solutions.
Douglas Elliman scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 5 for Offerpad Solutions), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DOUG | OPAD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $150M | $8.6M |
| Share price | $1.65 | $1.78 |
| Change, 1 year | −36.8% | −91.9% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −99.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.28 | 2.29 |
| Employees | 580 | 140 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 2.5× | – |
| P/S | 0.2× | 0.0× (better) |
| P/B | 0.9× | 0.3× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 0.5× | – |
| FCF yield | −4.7% (better) | −1267% |
| Fair value | $10.66 | $14.95 |
| Margin of safety | 84.5% | 88.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −3.5% (better) | −44.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.9% (better) | −11.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 7.8% |
| Operating margin | 5.3% (better) | −9.7% |
| Net margin | 5.7% (better) | −11.3% |
| FCF margin | −0.71% (better) | −31.1% |
| Return on equity | 39.1% (better) | −117% |
| Return on invested capital | 190% (better) | −216% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | 122× (better) | −4.4× |
| Current ratio | 1.63 (better) | 1.18 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.73 (better) | −1.69 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 53.1% | 34.4% |
| Held by insiders | 13.4% | – |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $200K |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.1% | – |
Go deeper
- DOUG stock overview
- DOUG income statement
- DOUG valuation and score
- OPAD stock overview
- OPAD income statement
- OPAD valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.