BRP vs Harley-Davidson
DOO and HOG side by side, both in transportation equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DOO and HOG compare
BRP grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (6.8% versus −14.6% for Harley-Davidson).
BRP keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.5% compared with −3.3% at Harley-Davidson.
Harley-Davidson pays a dividend yielding 2.2%; BRP does not pay one.
Harley-Davidson scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 3 for BRP), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DOO | HOG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $3.5B |
| Share price | $65.49 | $33.96 |
| Change, 1 year | 2.8% | 34.5% |
| Change, 5 years | −25.2% | −9.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.06 | 1.09 |
| Employees | – | 6,400 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 9 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 1 |
| Health score | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | – | 0.9× |
| P/B | – | 1.2× |
| P/FCF | – | 11.3× |
| FCF yield | – | 8.8% |
| Fair value | – | $48.98 |
| Margin of safety | – | 30.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 6.8% (better) | −14.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.2% (better) | 2.0% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −126% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −125% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −0.74% | 208% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 22.4% | 31.5% (better) |
| Operating margin | 4.7% (better) | −5.6% |
| Net margin | 3.5% (better) | −3.3% |
| FCF margin | 10.8% (better) | 7.8% |
| Return on equity | – | −4.0% |
| Return on invested capital | – | −3.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.77 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 5.05 | – |
| Interest coverage | 1.9× (better) | −12.0× |
| Current ratio | 1.27 | 1.97 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | – | 2.04 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.2% |
| Payout ratio | 21.6% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 5 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 10.4% |
| Buyback yield | – | 9.9% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 12.1% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 41.5% | 105% |
| Held by insiders | 41.0% | 1.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $1.4M |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 19.2% |
Go deeper
- DOO stock overview
- DOO income statement
- DOO valuation and score
- HOG stock overview
- HOG income statement
- HOG valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.