StockData

Dogness (International) vs WF

DOGZ and WFF side by side, both in miscellaneous manufacturing industries. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How DOGZ and WFF compare

WF grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (61.9% versus −23.3% for Dogness (International)).

WF keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −64.4% compared with −174% at Dogness (International).

Dogness (International) scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 4 for WF), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricDOGZWFF
Size and price
Share price$0.421$1.12
Change, 1 year−96.5%−64.2%
Change, 5 years−99.6%–
Beta (5Y)0.43–
Employees7142
StockData Score
Total score7 (better)4
Valuation score00
Growth score12 (better)
Performance score1 (better)0
Health score5 (better)2
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−23.3%61.9% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average67.4%–
Net income growth (TTM)–−4374%
EPS growth (TTM)–−4133%
Profitability
Gross margin16.0%31.9% (better)
Operating margin−181%−20.5% (better)
Net margin−174%−64.4% (better)
FCF margin−49.7%−36.7% (better)
Return on equity−32.0% (better)−83.9%
Return on invested capital−29.3%−26.0% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.02 (better)
Interest coverage–−90.8×
Current ratio1.124.99 (better)
Piotroski F-score24 (better)
Ownership
Held by institutions0.68%–
Held by insiders90.6%37.9%
Short interest, % of float0.97%1.0%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.