Duluth vs Zumiez
DLTH and ZUMZ side by side, both in apparel and accessory stores. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DLTH and ZUMZ compare
Zumiez is the larger company, worth 1.4 times as much as Duluth ($233M against $167M).
On earnings, Zumiez is cheaper: it trades at 23.3× trailing earnings, against 31.4× for Duluth.
Zumiez grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (3.6% versus −8.6% for Duluth).
Zumiez keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 1.4% compared with 1.1% at Duluth.
Zumiez scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 8 for Duluth), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DLTH | ZUMZ |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $167M | $233M |
| Share price | $4.39 | $15.17 |
| Change, 1 year | 47.8% | −31.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −73.6% | −70.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.70 | 1.24 |
| Employees | 89 | 6,600 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 3 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 2 | 2 |
| Health score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 31.4× | 23.3× (better) |
| P/S | 0.3× | 0.2× (better) |
| P/B | 0.9× | 0.8× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.2× | 3.4× (better) |
| P/FCF | 2.9× (better) | 9.3× |
| FCF yield | 34.5% (better) | 10.8% |
| Fair value | $4.57 | $16.35 |
| Margin of safety | 3.9% | 7.2% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −8.6% | 3.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −2.4% | −1.3% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 2086% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 6400% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −23.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 58.3% (better) | 36.1% |
| Operating margin | 1.7% | 2.2% (better) |
| Net margin | 1.1% | 1.4% (better) |
| FCF margin | 10.4% (better) | 2.7% |
| Return on equity | 3.4% | 4.4% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 4.7% | 6.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | 2.5× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.88 (better) | 1.71 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.44 (better) | 2.40 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | 14.9% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 14.9% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 15.3% | 85.5% |
| Held by insiders | 43.7% | 25.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $62.5K (better) | −$1.5M |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.4% | 14.0% |
Go deeper
- DLTH stock overview
- DLTH income statement
- DLTH valuation and score
- ZUMZ stock overview
- ZUMZ income statement
- ZUMZ valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.