Duluth vs Weyco
DLTH and WEYS side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DLTH and WEYS compare
Weyco is the larger company, worth 3.9 times as much as Duluth ($571M against $148M).
On earnings, Weyco is cheaper: it trades at 14.5× trailing earnings, against 27.9× for Duluth.
Weyco grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (1.5% versus −8.6% for Duluth).
Weyco keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 14.0% compared with 1.1% at Duluth.
Weyco pays a dividend yielding 5.2%; Duluth does not pay one.
Weyco scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 7 for Duluth), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DLTH | WEYS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $148M | $571M |
| Share price | $3.90 | $59.77 |
| Change, 1 year | 38.3% | 81.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −74.9% | 149% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.69 | 0.84 |
| Employees | 89 | 569 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 17 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 2 | 2 |
| Health score | 1 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 27.9× | 14.5× (better) |
| P/S | 0.3× (better) | 2.0× |
| P/B | 0.8× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.6× (better) | 9.4× |
| P/FCF | 2.6× (better) | 11.9× |
| FCF yield | 38.8% (better) | 8.4% |
| Fair value | $4.59 | $63.29 |
| Margin of safety | 15.0% (better) | 5.6% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −8.6% | 1.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −2.4% | 7.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 62.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 63.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 58.3% (better) | 51.4% |
| Operating margin | 1.7% | 17.1% (better) |
| Net margin | 1.1% | 14.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | 10.4% | 16.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | 3.4% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 4.7% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | 2.5× | 12115× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.88 | 8.97 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.39 | 9.28 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 5.2% |
| Payout ratio | – | 74.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 3 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 26.2% |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.22% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 5.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 15.3% | 25.5% |
| Held by insiders | 43.7% | 39.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $62.5K (better) | −$855K |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.5% | 2.0% |
Go deeper
- DLTH stock overview
- DLTH income statement
- DLTH valuation and score
- WEYS stock overview
- WEYS income statement
- WEYS valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.