Duluth vs Turning Point Brands
DLTH and TPB side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DLTH and TPB compare
Turning Point Brands is the larger company, worth 7.8 times as much as Duluth ($1.2B against $151M).
On earnings, Duluth is cheaper: it trades at 28.3× trailing earnings, against 42.3× for Turning Point Brands.
Turning Point Brands grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (23.8% versus −8.6% for Duluth).
Turning Point Brands keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.1% compared with 1.1% at Duluth.
Turning Point Brands pays a dividend yielding 0.54%; Duluth does not pay one.
Turning Point Brands scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 7 for Duluth), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DLTH | TPB |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $151M | $1.2B |
| Share price | $3.96 | $58.81 |
| Change, 1 year | 37.0% | −42.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −74.5% | 57.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.70 | 0.66 |
| Employees | 89 | 484 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 2 |
| Health score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 28.3× (better) | 42.3× |
| P/S | 0.3× (better) | 2.2× |
| P/B | 0.8× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.7× (better) | 21.2× |
| P/FCF | 2.6× (better) | 49.4× |
| PEG | – | 0.61 |
| FCF yield | 38.2% (better) | 2.0% |
| Fair value | $4.61 | $34.31 |
| Margin of safety | 14.2% (better) | −71.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −8.6% | 23.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −2.4% | 2.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −47.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −51.1% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 10.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 58.3% | 58.4% (better) |
| Operating margin | 1.7% | 10.9% (better) |
| Net margin | 1.1% | 5.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | 10.4% (better) | 4.4% |
| Return on equity | 3.4% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 4.7% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 0.73 |
| Interest coverage | 2.5× (better) | 2.3× |
| Current ratio | 1.88 | 5.83 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.40 | 3.56 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.54% |
| Payout ratio | – | 22.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 3 |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.54% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 15.3% | 100% |
| Held by insiders | 43.7% | 6.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $62.5K (better) | −$4.1M |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.5% | 17.8% |
Go deeper
- DLTH stock overview
- DLTH income statement
- DLTH valuation and score
- TPB stock overview
- TPB income statement
- TPB valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.