Dolphin Entertainment vs Regis
DLPN and RGS side by side, both in consumer discretionary. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DLPN and RGS compare
Regis is the larger company, worth 4.5 times as much as Dolphin Entertainment ($58.0M against $12.9M).
Dolphin Entertainment grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.4% versus −1.4% for Regis).
Regis keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 2.8% compared with −5.2% at Dolphin Entertainment.
Regis scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 5 for Dolphin Entertainment), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DLPN | RGS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $12.9M | $58.0M |
| Share price | $0.990 | $23.22 |
| Change, 1 year | −40.7% | −17.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −94.9% | −60.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.26 | 0.92 |
| Employees | 271 | 1,611 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 1 | 1 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 11.0× |
| P/S | 0.2× (better) | 0.3× |
| P/B | 2.0× | 0.3× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 22.6× | 5.3× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 5.1× |
| FCF yield | −8.7% | 19.6% (better) |
| Fair value | $1.71 | $49.59 |
| Margin of safety | 42.1% | 53.2% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 10.4% (better) | −1.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 18.7% (better) | −11.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −95.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 94.5% | – |
| Operating margin | −1.5% | 10.8% (better) |
| Net margin | −5.2% | 2.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | −1.9% | 5.2% (better) |
| Return on equity | −40.9% | 3.2% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −2.8% | 8.7% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 3.91 | 0.57 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 12.90 | 3.22 (better) |
| Interest coverage | −0.4× | 1.2× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.86 (better) | 0.56 |
| Altman Z-score | −2.72 | 0.86 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | −0.53% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% (better) | −0.53% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 3.4% | 31.0% |
| Held by insiders | 19.8% | 13.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $5.2M (better) | −$14.0K |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.23% | 2.0% |
Go deeper
- DLPN stock overview
- DLPN income statement
- DLPN valuation and score
- RGS stock overview
- RGS income statement
- RGS valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.