Dick's Sporting Goods vs Sportsman's Warehouse
DKS and SPWH side by side, both in miscellaneous retail. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DKS and SPWH compare
Dick's Sporting Goods is the larger company, worth 308 times as much as Sportsman's Warehouse ($12.8B against $41.5M).
Dick's Sporting Goods grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (53.5% versus 0.84% for Sportsman's Warehouse).
Dick's Sporting Goods keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.0% compared with −3.9% at Sportsman's Warehouse.
Dick's Sporting Goods pays a dividend yielding 3.5%; Sportsman's Warehouse does not pay one.
Dick's Sporting Goods scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 6 for Sportsman's Warehouse), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DKS | SPWH |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $12.8B | $41.5M |
| Share price | $143.84 | $1.06 |
| Change, 1 year | −36.2% | −59.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 10.9% | −93.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.10 | 0.46 |
| Employees | 105K | 5,400 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 3 | 3 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 15.5× | – |
| P/S | 0.6× | 0.0× (better) |
| P/B | 2.2× | 0.3× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.7× (better) | 30.1× |
| P/FCF | 53.4× | 1.3× (better) |
| FCF yield | 1.9% | 76.4% (better) |
| Fair value | $171.72 | $6.60 |
| Margin of safety | 16.2% | 83.9% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 53.5% (better) | 0.84% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 12.4% (better) | −3.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −28.5% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −35.0% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 11.8% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 32.1% (better) | 30.9% |
| Operating margin | 5.5% (better) | −2.8% |
| Net margin | 4.0% (better) | −3.9% |
| FCF margin | 1.1% | 2.6% (better) |
| Return on equity | 18.5% (better) | −25.8% |
| Return on invested capital | 24.2% (better) | −11.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.27 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 15.12 |
| Interest coverage | 16.4× (better) | −2.6× |
| Current ratio | 1.48 (better) | 1.17 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.70 (better) | 1.57 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.5% | – |
| Payout ratio | 52.8% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 3 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 31.1% | – |
| Buyback yield | 1.4% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 4.9% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 77.7% | 55.1% |
| Held by insiders | 73.4% | 8.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$42.0M | $0 (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 3 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 48.0% | 0.98% |
Go deeper
- DKS stock overview
- DKS income statement
- DKS valuation and score
- SPWH stock overview
- SPWH income statement
- SPWH valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.