Dick's Sporting Goods vs NIKE
DKS and NKE side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DKS and NKE compare
NIKE is the larger company, worth 4.5 times as much as Dick's Sporting Goods ($57.4B against $12.8B).
On earnings, Dick's Sporting Goods is cheaper: it trades at 15.5× trailing earnings, against 18.6× for NIKE.
Dick's Sporting Goods grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (53.5% versus −1.2% for NIKE).
NIKE keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 6.7% compared with 4.0% at Dick's Sporting Goods.
Both pay dividends: Dick's Sporting Goods yields 3.5% and NIKE 4.2%.
NIKE scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 10 for Dick's Sporting Goods), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DKS | NKE |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $12.8B | $57.4B |
| Share price | $143.84 | $38.67 |
| Change, 1 year | −36.2% | −40.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 10.9% | −78.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.10 | 1.02 |
| Employees | 105K | 73K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 3 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 15.5× (better) | 18.6× |
| P/S | 0.6× (better) | 1.3× |
| P/B | 2.2× (better) | 3.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.7× (better) | 12.6× |
| P/FCF | 53.4× | 27.3× (better) |
| FCF yield | 1.9% | 3.7% (better) |
| Fair value | $171.72 | $47.64 |
| Margin of safety | 16.2% | 18.8% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 53.5% (better) | −1.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 12.4% (better) | 0.82% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −28.5% | 6.8% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −35.0% | 6.7% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 11.8% (better) | −10.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 32.1% | 43.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | 5.5% | – |
| Net margin | 4.0% | 6.7% (better) |
| FCF margin | 1.1% | 4.6% (better) |
| Return on equity | 18.5% | 21.6% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 24.2% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.52 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 0.21 |
| Interest coverage | 16.4× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.48 | 2.07 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.70 | 3.13 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.5% | 4.2% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 52.8% | 78.4% |
| Years of dividend growth | 3 | 17 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 31.1% (better) | 8.8% |
| Buyback yield | 1.4% (better) | 0.03% |
| Shareholder yield | 4.9% (better) | 4.3% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 77.7% | 65.0% |
| Held by insiders | 73.4% | 15.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$42.0M | $1.5M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 3 | 3 |
| Short interest, % of float | 48.0% | 7.9% |
Go deeper
- DKS stock overview
- DKS income statement
- DKS valuation and score
- NKE stock overview
- NKE income statement
- NKE valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.