Delek Logistics Partners, LP vs Martin Midstream Partners L.P.
DKL and MMLP side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DKL and MMLP compare
Delek Logistics Partners, LP is the larger company, worth 32 times as much as Martin Midstream Partners L.P. ($2.8B against $87.6M).
Delek Logistics Partners, LP grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (35.5% versus 13.2% for Martin Midstream Partners L.P.).
Delek Logistics Partners, LP keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.9% compared with −1.4% at Martin Midstream Partners L.P..
Both pay dividends: Delek Logistics Partners, LP yields 6.4% and Martin Midstream Partners L.P. 0.89%.
Delek Logistics Partners, LP scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 6 for Martin Midstream Partners L.P.), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DKL | MMLP |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.8B | $87.6M |
| Share price | $53.30 | $2.24 |
| Change, 1 year | 16.3% | −13.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 18.4% | −21.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.45 | 0.44 |
| Employees | – | 1,723 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 2.2× | 0.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.4× | 5.6× (better) |
| P/FCF | 10.3× | – |
| FCF yield | 9.7% (better) | −21.3% |
| Fair value | $42.06 | $17.42 |
| Margin of safety | −26.7% | 87.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 35.5% (better) | 13.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 12.5% (better) | 1.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −5.2% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 16.6% | 50.6% (better) |
| Operating margin | 14.6% (better) | 6.2% |
| Net margin | 11.9% (better) | −1.4% |
| FCF margin | 21.0% (better) | −2.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Net debt / EBITDA | 6.10 | 4.69 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 0.9× (better) | 0.9× |
| Current ratio | 0.85 | 1.35 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | – | 1.91 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 6.4% (better) | 0.89% |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 6.4% (better) | 0.89% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 22.0% | 44.3% |
| Held by insiders | – | 66.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $700K (better) | $75.5K |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 0.62% |
Go deeper
- DKL stock overview
- DKL income statement
- DKL valuation and score
- MMLP stock overview
- MMLP income statement
- MMLP valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.