AMCON Distributing vs United Natural Foods
DIT and UNFI side by side, both in groceries and related products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DIT and UNFI compare
United Natural Foods is the larger company, worth 48 times as much as AMCON Distributing ($2.9B against $60.7M).
On earnings, AMCON Distributing is cheaper: it trades at 24.7× trailing earnings, against 35.7× for United Natural Foods.
AMCON Distributing grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.9% versus −2.0% for United Natural Foods).
United Natural Foods keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 0.27% compared with 0.08% at AMCON Distributing.
AMCON Distributing pays a dividend yielding 0.58%; United Natural Foods does not pay one.
AMCON Distributing scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 9 for United Natural Foods), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DIT | UNFI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $60.7M | $2.9B |
| Share price | $62.24 | $47.84 |
| Change, 1 year | −20.2% | 21.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −44.6% | −4.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.15 | 1.28 |
| Employees | 1,465 | 23K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 24.7× (better) | 35.7× |
| P/S | 0.0× (better) | 0.1× |
| P/B | 0.5× (better) | 1.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.0× (better) | 5.5× |
| P/FCF | – | 8.9× |
| PEG | – | 0.72 |
| FCF yield | −22.5% | 11.2% (better) |
| Fair value | $218.47 | $45.02 |
| Margin of safety | 71.5% (better) | −6.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 10.9% (better) | −2.0% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 13.3% (better) | 2.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 315% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 306% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −32.7% | −11.6% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 6.1% | 13.5% (better) |
| Operating margin | 0.44% | 0.68% (better) |
| Net margin | 0.08% | 0.27% (better) |
| FCF margin | −0.44% | 1.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | 2.1% | 5.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 6.8% | 7.0% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.09 | 0.00 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.44 (better) | −0.07 |
| Interest coverage | 1.4× | 1.7× (better) |
| Current ratio | 2.34 (better) | 1.29 |
| Altman Z-score | 8.67 (better) | 5.13 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.58% | – |
| Payout ratio | 27.7% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −29.4% | – |
| Buyback yield | – | 1.7% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.58% | 1.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 10.8% | 94.7% |
| Held by insiders | 75.0% | 5.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$661K |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.41% | 5.6% |
Go deeper
- DIT stock overview
- DIT income statement
- DIT valuation and score
- UNFI stock overview
- UNFI income statement
- UNFI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.