Diodes vs Penguin Solutions
DIOD and PENG side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DIOD and PENG compare
Diodes is the larger company, worth 1.4 times as much as Penguin Solutions ($4.0B against $2.9B).
On earnings, Penguin Solutions is cheaper: it trades at 18.2× trailing earnings, against 35.0× for Diodes.
Penguin Solutions grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (26.5% versus 24.2% for Diodes).
Penguin Solutions keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 10.4% compared with 6.5% at Diodes.
Penguin Solutions scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 12 for Diodes), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DIOD | PENG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.0B | $2.9B |
| Share price | $87.25 | $47.36 |
| Change, 1 year | 86.6% | 128% |
| Change, 5 years | −20.7% | 63.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.60 | 2.12 |
| Employees | 7,989 | 2,800 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 | 14 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 | 3 |
| Performance score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 35.0× | 18.2× (better) |
| P/S | 2.3× | 1.6× (better) |
| P/B | 2.1× (better) | 5.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | 27.1× | 14.0× (better) |
| P/FCF | 32.5× | – |
| FCF yield | 3.1% (better) | −5.7% |
| Fair value | $73.32 | $78.50 |
| Margin of safety | −19.0% | 39.7% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 24.2% | 26.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 3.8% | 10.4% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 80.0% | 611% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 80.4% | 829% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −5.3% | 42.7% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 33.3% (better) | 27.7% |
| Operating margin | 7.3% | 9.6% (better) |
| Net margin | 6.5% | 10.4% (better) |
| FCF margin | 7.0% (better) | −9.4% |
| Return on equity | 6.0% | 39.5% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 7.4% | 31.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 (better) | 1.52 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −4.42 | 0.66 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 41.4× | – |
| Current ratio | 3.07 (better) | 1.88 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.38 (better) | 2.22 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | 2.2% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 2.2% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 99.5% | 95.1% |
| Held by insiders | 1.1% | 14.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$16.5M | −$5.0M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.6% | 12.4% |
Go deeper
- DIOD stock overview
- DIOD income statement
- DIOD valuation and score
- PENG stock overview
- PENG income statement
- PENG valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.