Diodes vs OSI Systems
DIOD and OSIS side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DIOD and OSIS compare
Diodes is the larger company, worth 1.4 times as much as OSI Systems ($4.2B against $3.1B).
On earnings, OSI Systems is cheaper: it trades at 21.0× trailing earnings, against 36.8× for Diodes.
Diodes grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (24.2% versus 2.9% for OSI Systems).
OSI Systems keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 8.8% compared with 6.5% at Diodes.
OSI Systems scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 12 for Diodes), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DIOD | OSIS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.2B | $3.1B |
| Share price | $91.60 | $195.95 |
| Change, 1 year | 95.4% | −31.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −16.8% | 106% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.62 | 1.08 |
| Employees | 7,989 | 7,806 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 | 3 |
| Performance score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 36.8× | 21.0× (better) |
| P/S | 2.4× | 1.7× (better) |
| P/B | 2.2× (better) | 3.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | 28.7× | 14.5× (better) |
| P/FCF | 34.1× | 11.6× (better) |
| PEG | – | 1.12 |
| FCF yield | 2.9% | 8.6% (better) |
| Fair value | $74.49 | $238.62 |
| Margin of safety | −23.0% | 17.9% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 24.2% (better) | 2.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 3.8% | 9.3% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 80.0% (better) | 4.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 80.4% (better) | 5.7% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −5.3% | 17.3% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 33.3% (better) | 32.9% |
| Operating margin | 7.3% | 12.2% (better) |
| Net margin | 6.5% | 8.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | 7.0% | 14.7% (better) |
| Return on equity | 6.0% | 18.4% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 7.4% | 12.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 (better) | 1.28 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −4.42 | 2.67 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 41.4× (better) | 9.9× |
| Current ratio | 3.07 (better) | 2.89 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.49 (better) | 3.05 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 99.5% | 121% |
| Held by insiders | 1.1% | 6.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$16.5M | −$10.8M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.6% | 13.1% |
Go deeper
- DIOD stock overview
- DIOD income statement
- DIOD valuation and score
- OSIS stock overview
- OSIS income statement
- OSIS valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.