DHI vs Outdoor
DHX and POWW side by side, both in miscellaneous business services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DHX and POWW compare
Outdoor is the larger company, worth 1.4 times as much as DHI ($266M against $192M).
On earnings, DHI is cheaper: it trades at 23.2× trailing earnings, against 76.3× for Outdoor.
Outdoor grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (9.7% versus −5.0% for DHI).
Outdoor keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 12.1% compared with 6.3% at DHI.
DHI scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 10 for Outdoor), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DHX | POWW |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $192M | $266M |
| Share price | $4.41 | $2.29 |
| Change, 1 year | 152% | 22.5% |
| Change, 5 years | −14.7% | −63.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.95 | 1.39 |
| Employees | 270 | 63 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 (better) | 10 |
| Valuation score | 6 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 0 | 0 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 23.2× (better) | 76.3× |
| P/S | 1.5× (better) | 4.9× |
| P/B | 2.0× | 1.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.2× | 11.2× (better) |
| P/FCF | 8.6× (better) | 28.3× |
| FCF yield | 11.6% (better) | 3.5% |
| Fair value | $6.93 | $1.96 |
| Margin of safety | 36.3% (better) | −16.6% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −5.0% | 9.7% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.8% (better) | −3.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 82.1% | 86.5% (better) |
| Operating margin | 11.6% (better) | 5.6% |
| Net margin | 6.3% | 12.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | 17.9% (better) | 17.5% |
| Return on equity | 8.3% (better) | 2.8% |
| Return on invested capital | 8.4% (better) | 1.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.32 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.86 | – |
| Interest coverage | 6.1× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.42 | 4.74 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.16 | 5.01 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 7.6% (better) | 0.07% |
| Shareholder yield | 7.6% (better) | 0.07% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 70.5% | 58.8% |
| Held by insiders | 18.6% | 43.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$265K | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.88% | – |
Go deeper
- DHX stock overview
- DHX income statement
- DHX valuation and score
- POWW stock overview
- POWW income statement
- POWW valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.