Digi International vs Extreme Networks
DGII and EXTR side by side, both in computer and office equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DGII and EXTR compare
Extreme Networks is the larger company, worth 1.4 times as much as Digi International ($3.5B against $2.5B).
On earnings, Digi International is cheaper: it trades at 53.1× trailing earnings, against 68.4× for Extreme Networks.
Digi International grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (20.3% versus 11.3% for Extreme Networks).
Digi International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 9.6% compared with 4.0% at Extreme Networks.
Digi International scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 12 for Extreme Networks), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DGII | EXTR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.5B | $3.5B |
| Share price | $66.96 | $26.67 |
| Change, 1 year | 88.4% | 48.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 182% | 98.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.22 | 1.32 |
| Employees | 913 | 2,894 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 (better) | 12 |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 53.1× (better) | 68.4× |
| P/S | 5.0× | 2.7× (better) |
| P/B | 3.7× (better) | 39.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | 37.1× (better) | 46.4× |
| P/FCF | 18.7× (better) | 22.6× |
| PEG | 2.04 | – |
| FCF yield | 5.4% (better) | 4.4% |
| Fair value | $41.82 | $14.38 |
| Margin of safety | −60.1% (better) | −85.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 20.3% (better) | 11.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.0% (better) | 4.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 14.2% | 507% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 10.5% | 457% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 31.0% | 73.0% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 63.8% (better) | 61.9% |
| Operating margin | 13.9% (better) | 5.7% |
| Net margin | 9.6% (better) | 4.0% |
| FCF margin | 26.9% (better) | 11.8% |
| Return on equity | 7.5% | 67.1% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 7.8% | 124% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.16 (better) | 2.27 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.14 (better) | −0.60 |
| Interest coverage | 8.9× (better) | 4.9× |
| Current ratio | 1.13 (better) | 1.02 |
| Altman Z-score | 6.72 (better) | 1.98 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 0.45% | 2.9% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.45% | 2.9% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 105% | 98.4% |
| Held by insiders | 3.2% | 4.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$8.9M (better) | −$26.2M |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.7% | 4.1% |
Go deeper
- DGII stock overview
- DGII income statement
- DGII valuation and score
- EXTR stock overview
- EXTR income statement
- EXTR valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.