Dragonfly Energy vs E-Power
DFLI and EPOW side by side, both in electronic and other electrical equipment and components, except computer equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DFLI and EPOW compare
Dragonfly Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−16.8% versus −28.6% for E-Power).
E-Power keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −35.8% compared with −128% at Dragonfly Energy.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DFLI | EPOW |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.4M | – |
| Share price | $1.79 | $3.25 |
| Change, 1 year | −97.4% | −89.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −100.0% | −93.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.91 | 0.62 |
| Employees | 141 | 17 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 2 | 2 |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.1× | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −16.8% (better) | −28.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 14.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 24.4% (better) | −12.6% |
| Operating margin | −47.6% | −34.5% (better) |
| Net margin | −128% | −35.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | – | −68.0% |
| Return on invested capital | −139% | −43.8% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | −2.7× (better) | −14.3× |
| Current ratio | 1.10 (better) | 0.72 |
| Altman Z-score | −3.72 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 86.2% | – |
| Held by insiders | – | 18.1% |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 0.05% |
Go deeper
- DFLI stock overview
- DFLI income statement
- DFLI valuation and score
- EPOW stock overview
- EPOW income statement
- EPOW valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.