Dream Finders Homes vs M/I Homes
DFH and MHO side by side, both in operative builders. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DFH and MHO compare
M/I Homes is the larger company, worth 3.2 times as much as Dream Finders Homes ($3.2B against $979M).
On earnings, Dream Finders Homes is cheaper: it trades at 11.5× trailing earnings, against 12.1× for M/I Homes.
M/I Homes grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−6.0% versus −10.9% for Dream Finders Homes).
M/I Homes keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 6.6% compared with 2.6% at Dream Finders Homes.
M/I Homes scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 10 for Dream Finders Homes), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DFH | MHO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $979M | $3.2B |
| Share price | $10.66 | $126.96 |
| Change, 1 year | −45.4% | −1.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −40.5% | 111% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.26 | 1.16 |
| Employees | 1,911 | 1,801 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 11.5× (better) | 12.1× |
| P/S | 0.2× (better) | 0.8× |
| P/B | 0.7× (better) | 1.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.4× (better) | 7.4× |
| P/FCF | – | 23.2× |
| FCF yield | −18.9% | 4.3% (better) |
| Fair value | $13.75 | $110.04 |
| Margin of safety | 22.5% (better) | −15.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −10.9% | −6.0% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 30.7% (better) | 7.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −63.0% | −41.3% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −67.0% | −38.3% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 12.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 20.7% |
| Operating margin | – | 8.2% |
| Net margin | 2.6% | 6.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | −4.4% | 3.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | 7.6% | 8.7% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 10.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.63 | 3.29 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 4.9% | 6.4% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 4.9% | 6.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 33.8% | 98.8% |
| Held by insiders | 71.6% | 3.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$8.8M (better) | −$25.3M |
| Short interest, % of float | 38.0% | 6.3% |
Go deeper
- DFH stock overview
- DFH income statement
- DFH valuation and score
- MHO stock overview
- MHO income statement
- MHO valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.