Dream Finders Homes vs Everus Construction
DFH and ECG side by side, both in operative builders. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DFH and ECG compare
Everus Construction is the larger company, worth 4.4 times as much as Dream Finders Homes ($4.4B against $979M).
On earnings, Dream Finders Homes is cheaper: it trades at 11.5× trailing earnings, against 15.1× for Everus Construction.
Everus Construction grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (33.5% versus −10.9% for Dream Finders Homes).
Everus Construction keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 6.2% compared with 2.6% at Dream Finders Homes.
Everus Construction scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 10 for Dream Finders Homes), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DFH | ECG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $979M | $4.4B |
| Share price | $10.66 | $85.25 |
| Change, 1 year | −45.4% | −14.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −40.5% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.26 | 1.90 |
| Employees | 1,911 | 10K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 | 17 (better) |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 11.5× (better) | 15.1× |
| P/S | 0.2× (better) | 0.9× |
| P/B | 0.7× (better) | 5.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.4× (better) | 12.2× |
| P/FCF | – | 18.3× |
| PEG | – | 0.87 |
| FCF yield | −18.9% | 5.5% (better) |
| Fair value | $13.75 | $88.29 |
| Margin of safety | 22.5% (better) | 3.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −10.9% | 33.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 30.7% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −63.0% | 59.9% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −67.0% | 60.1% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 13.6% |
| Operating margin | – | 8.2% |
| Net margin | 2.6% | 6.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | −4.4% | 5.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | 7.6% | 40.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 30.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.66 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 0.79 |
| Interest coverage | – | 18.7× |
| Current ratio | – | 1.53 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.63 | 4.25 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 4.9% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 4.9% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 33.8% | 85.0% |
| Held by insiders | 71.6% | 0.57% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$8.8M | −$283K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 38.0% | 4.1% |
Go deeper
- DFH stock overview
- DFH income statement
- DFH valuation and score
- ECG stock overview
- ECG income statement
- ECG valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.