Deckers Outdoor vs Under Armour
DECK and UAA side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DECK and UAA compare
Deckers Outdoor is the larger company, worth 5.2 times as much as Under Armour ($11.2B against $2.1B).
Deckers Outdoor grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (7.9% versus −3.6% for Under Armour).
Deckers Outdoor keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 18.4% compared with −10.0% at Under Armour.
Deckers Outdoor scores higher on the StockData Score (21 against 2 for Under Armour), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DECK | UAA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $11.2B | $2.1B |
| Share price | $81.99 | $4.99 |
| Change, 1 year | −2.2% | 8.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 16.2% | −80.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.02 | 1.29 |
| Employees | 6,000 | 14K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 21 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 11.6× | – |
| P/S | 2.0× | 0.4× (better) |
| P/B | 4.9× | 1.5× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.2× | – |
| P/FCF | 10.0× | – |
| PEG | 0.39 | – |
| FCF yield | 10.0% (better) | −3.8% |
| Fair value | $139.76 | $5.67 |
| Margin of safety | 41.3% (better) | 12.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 7.9% (better) | −3.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 16.5% (better) | −1.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 2.5% (better) | −585% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 8.1% (better) | −623% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 25.6% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 57.8% (better) | 46.8% |
| Operating margin | 22.7% (better) | −2.4% |
| Net margin | 18.4% (better) | −10.0% |
| FCF margin | 20.2% (better) | −1.6% |
| Return on equity | 42.6% (better) | −29.8% |
| Return on invested capital | 137% (better) | −5.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.41 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 328× (better) | −1.9× |
| Current ratio | 2.75 (better) | 1.81 |
| Altman Z-score | 8.09 (better) | 1.97 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 11.0% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 11.0% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 98.2% | 92.2% |
| Held by insiders | 0.88% | 39.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.0M | $225M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.7% | – |
Go deeper
- DECK stock overview
- DECK income statement
- DECK valuation and score
- UAA stock overview
- UAA income statement
- UAA valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.