Easterly Government Properties vs UMH Properties
DEA and UMH side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DEA and UMH compare
UMH Properties is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as Easterly Government Properties ($1.2B against $1.0B).
On earnings, Easterly Government Properties is cheaper: it trades at 76.1× trailing earnings, against 291× for UMH Properties.
Easterly Government Properties grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (11.4% versus 8.5% for UMH Properties).
Both pay dividends: Easterly Government Properties yields 6.1% and UMH Properties 6.2%.
Easterly Government Properties scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 10 for UMH Properties), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DEA | UMH |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.0B | $1.2B |
| Share price | $22.06 | $14.55 |
| Change, 1 year | 3.2% | −4.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −58.5% | −37.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.55 | 0.61 |
| Employees | 55 | 540 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 (better) | 10 |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 76.1× (better) | 291× |
| P/S | 2.9× (better) | 4.5× |
| P/B | 0.8× (better) | 1.4× |
| Fair value | $23.29 | $13.80 |
| Margin of safety | 5.3% (better) | −5.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 11.4% (better) | 8.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.5% | 9.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 4.6% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −6.5% (better) | −37.5% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −6.4% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 77.2% | – |
| Net margin | 4.0% | – |
| Return on equity | 1.1% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.48 | 0.98 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 6.1% | 6.2% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 604% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −5.0% | 4.3% (better) |
| Buyback yield | −2.0% | −0.42% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 4.1% | 5.8% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 77.8% | 76.7% |
| Held by insiders | 13.6% | 10.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $118K |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.5% | 5.6% |
Go deeper
- DEA stock overview
- DEA income statement
- DEA valuation and score
- UMH stock overview
- UMH income statement
- UMH valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.