Easterly Government Properties vs LXP Industrial Trust
DEA and LXP side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DEA and LXP compare
LXP Industrial Trust is the larger company, worth 3.4 times as much as Easterly Government Properties ($3.6B against $1.1B).
On earnings, LXP Industrial Trust is cheaper: it trades at 61.2× trailing earnings, against 112× for Easterly Government Properties.
Easterly Government Properties grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (13.0% versus −4.2% for LXP Industrial Trust).
LXP Industrial Trust keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 18.7% compared with 2.9% at Easterly Government Properties.
Both pay dividends: Easterly Government Properties yields 8.1% and LXP Industrial Trust 3.4%.
Easterly Government Properties scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 4 for LXP Industrial Trust), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DEA | LXP |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.1B | $3.6B |
| Share price | $22.33 | $61.18 |
| Change, 1 year | 3.6% | 28.5% |
| Change, 5 years | −57.9% | −17.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.56 | 0.76 |
| Employees | 55 | 58 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 (better) | 4 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 | 1 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 112× | 61.2× (better) |
| P/S | 3.0× (better) | 10.4× |
| P/B | 0.8× (better) | 1.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 10.9× |
| Fair value | $40.99 | $40.25 |
| Margin of safety | 45.5% (better) | −52.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 13.0% (better) | −4.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.5% (better) | 1.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −41.6% | −25.9% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −50.0% | −29.1% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −6.4% (better) | −11.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 77.3% | 81.5% (better) |
| Net margin | 2.9% | 18.7% (better) |
| Return on equity | 0.77% | 3.2% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 0.47 | 1.54 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 8.1% (better) | 3.4% |
| Payout ratio | 848% | 258% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −5.0% | 5.2% (better) |
| Buyback yield | −3.6% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 4.4% (better) | 3.4% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 77.8% | 95.1% |
| Held by insiders | 13.6% | 3.7% |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.2% | 2.0% |
Go deeper
- DEA stock overview
- DEA income statement
- DEA valuation and score
- LXP stock overview
- LXP income statement
- LXP valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.