StockData

DoubleDown Interactive vs Meridian

DDI and MRDN side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How DDI and MRDN compare

DoubleDown Interactive grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (14.0% versus 9.3% for Meridian).

DoubleDown Interactive keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 32.9% compared with −50.0% at Meridian.

DoubleDown Interactive scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 5 for Meridian), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricDDIMRDN
Size and price
Market cap–$71.5M
Share price$15.77$5.64
Change, 1 year68.8%−51.6%
Change, 5 years−2.5%−94.1%
Beta (5Y)0.540.46
Employees2601,200
StockData Score
Total score13 (better)5
Valuation score03 (better)
Growth score3 (better)0
Performance score5 (better)0
Health score5 (better)2
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–0.4×
P/B–2.0×
Fair value–$13.09
Margin of safety–56.9%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)14.0% (better)9.3%
Revenue growth, 5Y average0.09%520% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)17.6%–
EPS growth (TTM)17.6%–
EPS growth, 5Y average9.6%–
Profitability
Gross margin73.4% (better)55.3%
Operating margin36.0% (better)−52.4%
Net margin32.9% (better)−50.0%
FCF margin38.6%–
Return on equity13.1% (better)−122%
Return on invested capital18.4% (better)−108%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.03 (better)0.21
Net debt / EBITDA−2.88–
Interest coverage112× (better)−51.0×
Current ratio18.67 (better)0.78
Altman Z-score–−1.48
Piotroski F-score6 (better)3
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield–0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions–5.2%
Held by insiders67.1%–
Insider net buying, 12 months–−$1.8M

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.