DocGo vs Verra Mobility
DCGO and VRRM side by side, both in transportation services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DCGO and VRRM compare
Verra Mobility is the larger company, worth 14 times as much as DocGo ($280M against $20.5M).
Verra Mobility grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−14.0% versus −19.2% for DocGo).
Verra Mobility keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 33.2% compared with −61.0% at DocGo.
Verra Mobility scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 6 for DocGo), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DCGO | VRRM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $20.5M | $280M |
| Share price | $0.208 | $1.84 |
| Change, 1 year | −80.9% | −92.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −97.8% | −88.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.24 | 0.54 |
| Employees | 3,600 | 1,901 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 7.7× |
| P/S | 0.1× (better) | 2.5× |
| P/B | 0.2× (better) | 1.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 4.9× |
| P/FCF | – | 2.0× |
| PEG | – | 0.40 |
| FCF yield | −148% | 49.1% (better) |
| Fair value | $2.15 | $11.19 |
| Margin of safety | 90.3% (better) | 83.6% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −19.2% | −14.0% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 27.9% | 58.5% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −26.0% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −27.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | −53.3% | 112% (better) |
| Net margin | −61.0% | 33.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | −10.2% | 120% (better) |
| Return on equity | −96.5% | 11.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −88.3% | 5.3% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 (better) | 3.90 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 3.71 |
| Interest coverage | – | 2.1× |
| Current ratio | 1.38 | 2.05 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −2.82 | 0.41 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | 66.1% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 66.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 38.5% | 101% |
| Held by insiders | 9.8% | 0.99% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$15.3K (better) | −$25.3K |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.4% | 5.0% |
Go deeper
- DCGO stock overview
- DCGO income statement
- DCGO valuation and score
- VRRM stock overview
- VRRM income statement
- VRRM valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.