StockData

DBV Technologies vs TScan Therapeutics

DBVT and TCRX side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How DBVT and TCRX compare

DBV Technologies is the larger company, worth 288 times as much as TScan Therapeutics ($3.6B against $12.6M).

DBV Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−31.6% versus −38.4% for TScan Therapeutics).

TScan Therapeutics keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −2219% compared with −5405% at DBV Technologies.

DBV Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 4 for TScan Therapeutics), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricDBVTTCRX
Size and price
Market cap$3.6B$12.6M
Share price$11.51$0.186
Change, 1 year−17.6%−83.0%
Change, 5 years88.1%−97.9%
Beta (5Y)0.580.94
Employees125142
StockData Score
Total score6 (better)4
Valuation score03 (better)
Growth score00
Performance score00
Health score6 (better)1
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S943×2.4× (better)
P/B24.4×0.3× (better)
FCF yield−5.3% (better)−888%
Fair value–$0.857
Margin of safety–78.3%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−31.6% (better)−38.4%
Revenue growth, 5Y average−13.0%56.9% (better)
Profitability
Operating margin−5432%−2247% (better)
Net margin−5405%−2219% (better)
FCF margin−4998%−2153% (better)
Return on equity−206%−126% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.87 (better)
Interest coverage–−40.7×
Current ratio3.24 (better)2.03
Altman Z-score27.93 (better)−8.19
Piotroski F-score4 (better)2
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions6.8%53.5%
Held by insiders12.1%32.8%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$15.5M$146K (better)
Superinvestors holding1–
Short interest, % of float–4.4%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.