Designer Brands vs Steven Madden
DBI and SHOO side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DBI and SHOO compare
Steven Madden is the larger company, worth 9.4 times as much as Designer Brands ($3.1B against $326M).
Steven Madden grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (20.4% versus −0.84% for Designer Brands).
Both pay dividends: Designer Brands yields 3.1% and Steven Madden 2.0%.
Steven Madden scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 10 for Designer Brands), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DBI | SHOO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $326M | $3.1B |
| Share price | $6.38 | $42.00 |
| Change, 1 year | 57.9% | 8.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −59.2% | −14.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.38 | 1.18 |
| Employees | 13K | 6,300 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 25.5× | – |
| P/S | 0.1× (better) | 1.1× |
| P/B | – | 3.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | 1.8× (better) | 11.4× |
| P/FCF | 2.7× (better) | 15.0× |
| FCF yield | 36.8% (better) | 6.7% |
| Fair value | $10.60 | $35.65 |
| Margin of safety | 39.8% (better) | −17.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −0.84% | 20.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.3% | 16.1% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 45.7% | 46.8% (better) |
| Operating margin | 3.5% | 8.7% (better) |
| Net margin | 0.59% | – |
| FCF margin | 4.1% | 7.2% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 16.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.12 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.28 | 0.42 (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.22 | 1.86 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.85 | 5.49 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.1% (better) | 2.0% |
| Payout ratio | 57.9% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 14.9% | 41.1% (better) |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.45% |
| Shareholder yield | 3.1% (better) | 2.5% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 70.3% | 100% |
| Held by insiders | 48.4% | 2.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.8M (better) | −$3.1M |
| Short interest, % of float | 19.6% | 5.3% |
Go deeper
- DBI stock overview
- DBI income statement
- DBI valuation and score
- SHOO stock overview
- SHOO income statement
- SHOO valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.