Endava vs Formula Systems (1985)
DAVA and FORTY side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DAVA and FORTY compare
Formula Systems (1985) grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (18.4% versus 4.3% for Endava).
Formula Systems (1985) scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 2 for Endava), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DAVA | FORTY |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $1.57 | $127.28 |
| Change, 1 year | −83.4% | −14.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −99.0% | 3.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.49 | 0.74 |
| Employees | 3,289 | 500 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 2 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 4.3% | 18.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 17.1% (better) | 6.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 661% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 24.1% | 654% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 0.00% | 66.4% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 25.1% (better) | 19.8% |
| Operating margin | 4.1% | – |
| Net margin | – | 23.1% |
| FCF margin | – | 13.9% |
| Return on equity | – | 59.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.27 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −2.53 |
| Interest coverage | 2.0× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.39 (better) | 1.63 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 6 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 16.2% | 5.2% |
| Held by insiders | 0.42% | 11.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$11.9K | – |
Go deeper
- DAVA stock overview
- DAVA income statement
- DAVA valuation and score
- FORTY stock overview
- FORTY income statement
- FORTY valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.