DoorDash vs Uber Technologies
DASH and UBER side by side, both in miscellaneous business services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DASH and UBER compare
Uber Technologies is the larger company, worth 1.7 times as much as DoorDash ($133B against $77.6B).
DoorDash grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (35.0% versus 16.7% for Uber Technologies).
Uber Technologies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 17.3% compared with 6.2% at DoorDash.
Uber Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 13 for DoorDash), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DASH | UBER |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $77.6B | $133B |
| Share price | $178.99 | $65.25 |
| Change, 1 year | −32.7% | −31.9% |
| Change, 5 years | −9.9% | 38.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.87 | 1.29 |
| Employees | 31K | 34K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 | 3 |
| Performance score | 4 | 4 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 14.3× |
| P/S | 4.5× | 2.4× (better) |
| P/B | 7.2× | 4.9× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 35.1× | 18.9× (better) |
| P/FCF | 28.8× | 13.2× (better) |
| FCF yield | 3.5% | 7.6% (better) |
| Fair value | $71.27 | $99.92 |
| Margin of safety | −151% | 34.7% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 35.0% (better) | 16.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 36.6% (better) | 36.1% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 23.2% (better) | −24.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −22.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 51.9% (better) | 42.3% |
| Operating margin | 5.3% | 12.1% (better) |
| Net margin | 6.2% | 17.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | 15.8% | 18.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | 10.5% | 38.4% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 17.2% | 22.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.47 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 0.98 |
| Interest coverage | – | 14.5× |
| Current ratio | 1.46 (better) | 0.84 |
| Altman Z-score | 5.56 (better) | 3.10 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.00% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Buyback yield | 1.4% | 5.2% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 1.4% | 5.2% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 88.6% | 82.6% |
| Held by insiders | 14.6% | 0.19% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$218M | $11.4M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 5 | 11 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.3% | 2.4% |
Go deeper
- DASH stock overview
- DASH income statement
- DASH valuation and score
- UBER stock overview
- UBER income statement
- UBER valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.