Youdao vs Leifras
DAO and LFS side by side, both in services-educational services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DAO and LFS compare
Leifras grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.6% versus 5.0% for Youdao).
Leifras scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 1 for Youdao), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DAO | LFS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $19.07 | $1.96 |
| Change, 1 year | 82.0% | −70.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 27.0% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.78 | −0.21 |
| Employees | 3,595 | 1,055 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 1 | 9 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.0% | 10.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 18.5% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 7.5% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 28.6% (better) | 4.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 44.3% (better) | 31.0% |
| Operating margin | 3.7% | 5.3% (better) |
| Net margin | – | 3.8% |
| FCF margin | 0.50% | 3.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 30.6% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 56.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.09 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 0.17 |
| Interest coverage | 3.5× | 52.0× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.59 | 1.51 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 9 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 4.7% | 0.30% |
| Held by insiders | 23.1% | 52.2% |
Go deeper
- DAO stock overview
- DAO income statement
- DAO valuation and score
- LFS stock overview
- LFS income statement
- LFS valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.