Youdao vs iHuman
DAO and IH side by side, both in services-educational services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DAO and IH compare
Youdao grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.0% versus −12.5% for iHuman).
iHuman scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 1 for Youdao), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DAO | IH |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $19.18 | $1.01 |
| Change, 1 year | 78.4% | −62.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 27.7% | −80.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.78 | 0.20 |
| Employees | 3,595 | 558 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 1 | 8 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.0% (better) | −12.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 18.5% (better) | 8.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −3.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 28.6% (better) | 0.00% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 44.3% | 67.9% (better) |
| Operating margin | 3.7% | 8.3% (better) |
| Net margin | – | 11.8% |
| FCF margin | 0.50% | 5.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 9.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | 3.5× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.59 | 3.57 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Payout ratio | – | 41.0% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 4.7% | 0.03% |
| Held by insiders | 23.1% | 32.9% |
Go deeper
- DAO stock overview
- DAO income statement
- DAO valuation and score
- IH stock overview
- IH income statement
- IH valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.