DANA vs Dauch
DAN and DCH side by side, both in motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DAN and DCH compare
DANA is the larger company, worth 2.2 times as much as Dauch ($2.5B against $1.1B).
Dauch grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (41.0% versus 3.7% for DANA).
DANA keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 14.6% compared with −2.0% at Dauch.
DANA pays a dividend yielding 2.0%; Dauch does not pay one.
DANA scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 7 for Dauch), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DAN | DCH |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.5B | $1.1B |
| Share price | $23.11 | $4.78 |
| Change, 1 year | 7.2% | −28.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −2.0% | −51.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.40 | 1.69 |
| Employees | 27K | 18K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 2.3× | – |
| P/S | 0.3× | 0.1× (better) |
| P/B | 1.3× | 0.8× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 17.0× | 7.6× (better) |
| P/FCF | 21.2× | – |
| FCF yield | 4.7% (better) | −2.2% |
| Fair value | $17.51 | $7.01 |
| Margin of safety | −32.0% | 31.8% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 3.7% | 41.0% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 1.1% | 4.4% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −487% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −406% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 9.5% | 10.9% (better) |
| Operating margin | 2.7% (better) | 0.98% |
| Net margin | 14.6% (better) | −2.0% |
| FCF margin | 1.5% (better) | −0.30% |
| Return on equity | 71.4% (better) | −15.2% |
| Return on invested capital | 3.1% (better) | 1.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.70 (better) | 3.39 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.82 (better) | 5.96 |
| Interest coverage | 1.5× (better) | 0.3× |
| Current ratio | 1.49 (better) | 1.40 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.23 (better) | 0.91 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.0% | – |
| Payout ratio | 4.6% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 32.0% | – |
| Buyback yield | 22.6% (better) | 0.73% |
| Shareholder yield | 24.6% (better) | 0.73% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 99.8% | 101% |
| Held by insiders | 1.6% | 4.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$298K | $182K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.4% | 8.2% |
Go deeper
- DAN stock overview
- DAN income statement
- DAN valuation and score
- DCH stock overview
- DCH income statement
- DCH valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.