Daktronics vs Oil-Dri Corp of America
DAKT and ODC side by side, both in miscellaneous manufacturing industries. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DAKT and ODC compare
Daktronics and Oil-Dri Corp of America are about the same size, with market caps of $958M and $1.1B.
Daktronics grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (14.0% versus 1.7% for Oil-Dri Corp of America).
Oil-Dri Corp of America keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.5% compared with 5.7% at Daktronics.
Oil-Dri Corp of America pays a dividend yielding 0.86%; Daktronics does not pay one.
Daktronics scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 9 for Oil-Dri Corp of America), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DAKT | ODC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $958M | $1.1B |
| Share price | $19.91 | $73.48 |
| Change, 1 year | 4.2% | 31.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 299% | 324% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.18 | 0.58 |
| Employees | 2,423 | 927 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 20.3× | – |
| P/S | 1.1× (better) | 2.2× |
| P/B | 3.0× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 10.0× (better) | 10.9× |
| P/FCF | 24.1× | 23.2× (better) |
| PEG | 0.24 | – |
| FCF yield | 4.2% | 4.3% (better) |
| Fair value | $19.09 | $63.01 |
| Margin of safety | −4.3% (better) | −16.6% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 14.0% (better) | 1.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 11.7% (better) | 10.1% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 328% (better) | 5.5% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 30.8% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 27.6% | 27.8% (better) |
| Operating margin | 7.3% | 13.8% (better) |
| Net margin | 5.7% | 11.5% (better) |
| FCF margin | 4.7% | 9.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | 16.2% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 29.8% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.03 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −1.76 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | 30.9× |
| Current ratio | 2.17 | 3.07 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 4.71 | 8.00 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.86% |
| Payout ratio | – | 18.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 3 |
| Buyback yield | 2.0% (better) | 1.2% |
| Shareholder yield | 2.0% | 2.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 76.1% | 53.5% |
| Held by insiders | 27.2% | 16.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$145K (better) | −$1.1M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.6% | 7.0% |
Go deeper
- DAKT stock overview
- DAKT income statement
- DAKT valuation and score
- ODC stock overview
- ODC income statement
- ODC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.