Data I/O vs MOVING iMAGE TECHNOLOGIES
DAIO and MITQ side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DAIO and MITQ compare
Data I/O is the larger company, worth 5.2 times as much as MOVING iMAGE TECHNOLOGIES ($25.8M against $5.0M).
MOVING iMAGE TECHNOLOGIES grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−4.6% versus −21.8% for Data I/O).
MOVING iMAGE TECHNOLOGIES keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −1.7% compared with −50.1% at Data I/O.
MOVING iMAGE TECHNOLOGIES scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 8 for Data I/O), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DAIO | MITQ |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $25.8M | $5.0M |
| Share price | $2.48 | $0.500 |
| Change, 1 year | −13.3% | −35.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −49.1% | −79.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.85 | 0.46 |
| Employees | 97 | 25 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 3 |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 1.5× | 0.3× (better) |
| P/B | 2.2× | 1.1× (better) |
| FCF yield | −29.5% (better) | −50.6% |
| Fair value | $3.67 | $1.95 |
| Margin of safety | 32.4% | 74.4% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −21.8% | −4.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 1.1% | 19.0% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 50.6% (better) | 29.1% |
| Operating margin | −43.7% | −2.9% (better) |
| Net margin | −50.1% | −1.7% (better) |
| FCF margin | −42.8% | −14.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | −61.2% | −6.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −148% | −141% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 1.93 | 2.27 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.52 | 1.96 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 0.05% | 0.12% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.05% | 0.12% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 29.9% | 5.8% |
| Held by insiders | 19.9% | 1.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $1000K | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.14% | 0.51% |
Go deeper
- DAIO stock overview
- DAIO income statement
- DAIO valuation and score
- MITQ stock overview
- MITQ income statement
- MITQ valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.