Data I/O vs Frequency Electronics
DAIO and FEIM side by side, both in laboratory apparatus and analytical, optical, measuring, and controlling instruments. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DAIO and FEIM compare
Frequency Electronics is the larger company, worth 30 times as much as Data I/O ($769M against $25.8M).
Frequency Electronics grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (6.3% versus −21.8% for Data I/O).
Frequency Electronics keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.7% compared with −50.1% at Data I/O.
Frequency Electronics scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 8 for Data I/O), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DAIO | FEIM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $25.8M | $769M |
| Share price | $2.48 | $68.23 |
| Change, 1 year | −13.3% | 118% |
| Change, 5 years | −49.1% | 598% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.85 | 0.77 |
| Employees | 97 | 242 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 10 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 273× |
| P/S | 1.5× (better) | 10.6× |
| P/B | 2.2× (better) | 6.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 200× |
| FCF yield | −29.5% | −0.02% (better) |
| Fair value | $3.67 | $9.99 |
| Margin of safety | 32.4% (better) | −583% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −21.8% | 6.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 1.1% | 3.1% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −87.8% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −89.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 50.6% (better) | 33.0% |
| Operating margin | −43.7% | 2.5% (better) |
| Net margin | −50.1% | 3.7% (better) |
| FCF margin | −42.8% | −0.25% (better) |
| Return on equity | −61.2% | 3.0% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −148% | 3.4% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | – | 22.4× |
| Current ratio | 1.93 | 5.34 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.52 | 14.96 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 0.05% | 0.13% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.05% | 0.13% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 29.9% | 66.6% |
| Held by insiders | 19.9% | 24.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $1000K (better) | −$37.5M |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.14% | 11.1% |
Go deeper
- DAIO stock overview
- DAIO income statement
- DAIO valuation and score
- FEIM stock overview
- FEIM income statement
- FEIM valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.