CID Holdco vs Fusemachines
DAIC and FUSE side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DAIC and FUSE compare
Fusemachines is the larger company, worth 4.1 times as much as CID Holdco ($10.1M against $2.5M).
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DAIC | FUSE |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.5M | $10.1M |
| Share price | $1.05 | $0.348 |
| Change, 1 year | −98.3% | −82.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.70 | 0.22 |
| Employees | 68 | 270 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 1 | 1 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 1 |
| Growth score | 0 | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.5× (better) | 1.4× |
| FCF yield | – | −98.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 42.8% | 52.4% (better) |
| Operating margin | −253% | −144% (better) |
| Net margin | −277% | – |
| FCF margin | – | −133% |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | −11.4× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.27 | 0.29 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −19.64 | −19.47 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | – | 23.8% |
| Held by insiders | – | 66.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$130K | – |
Go deeper
- DAIC stock overview
- DAIC income statement
- DAIC valuation and score
- FUSE stock overview
- FUSE income statement
- FUSE valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.